David
Cameron is quite right to try and block Jean-Claude Juncker's candidadacy for
president of the European Commission, but his reasons for blocking the candidacy
are wrong.
The
Commission is a powerful body and part of the legislative process of the
European Union. It is not democratically accountable to the people of
Europe. It would therefore be legitimate for Cameron to argue that the powers
of the Commission should be removed and it should act like a civil service for
Europe, in which case the position as president would not be so
important.
On the
other hand if Cameron does not want to do this he should make the case for the
president of the Commission to be directly elected by and accountable to the
people of the European Union. This would reduce the democratic deficit between
the institutions of Europe and the people.
By
arguing as he does, that the position of president should be determined by
secret negotiation in closed rooms is an affront to democracy and Cameron will
deservedly lose that
argument.